Home » PRODUCT REVIEWS

Microsoft: Win XP sometimes Faster than Vista SP1

Submitted by Srikanth on Monday, 10 March 20083 Comments

Windows XP sometimes handles common consumer and business tasks faster than the new Windows Vista SP1, Microsoft’s own tests show. Part 1 of a special five-part series.

Windows XP is faster than the new Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) in completing common consumer and business tasks on PCs coming out of sleep mode, but the differences are slight.

The performance tests, conducted by Principled Technologies Inc. on Microsoft’s behalf, showed that the older XP operating system remained faster than Vista SP1 in 61% of the operations grouped in a consumer test suite, and faster than Vista SP1 in 46% of the operations in the business-oriented head-to-head.

The results were from time trials held on identical PCs after they’d come out of standby, a power-saving feature in Windows. Vista, like other operating systems, including Apple Inc.’s Mac OS X, calls the same mode “sleep.”

However, when the same tests were run after a cold boot — with the PC’s power turned on, the OS booted and the scripts run after two minutes — Vista SP1 came out on top in 74% of the tested consumer functions, and 66% of the business operations.

Differences Were Small

But no matter which operating system came out on top, the differences were small in virtually every case, said Principled Technologies. The total difference between XP and Vista SP1 in the 31 consumer tasks, for instance, was less than 5 seconds; of the 64 chores in the business scenario, 60 sported a difference of under half a second.

“Overall, Windows Vista SP1 and Windows XP performed comparably on most test operations,” Principled Technologies concluded in its report.

The tests were run on four systems — two notebooks, two desktops — from Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co. and Toshiba Corp.

A fifth system, another HP desktop, was omitted from the aggregate results because it, “produced unacceptably high variability in its test results,” according to Principled. Interestingly, that system showed XP was faster than Vista SP1 in more chores than any of the other test machines. In the consumer test set, for example, XP was faster than Vista SP1 in 74% of the operations immediately after a reboot of the discarded HP.

Windows XP performed much poorer on the dropped HP in the business tests; it was faster than Vista SP1 only 31% of the time, lower than the average of the other four PCs. But when it came out of standby, XP beat Vista SP1 in 53% of the business-oriented jobs, a higher percentage than the other machines.

That, among other things, touched some nerves. Several users commenting on Microsoft’s official Vista blog - where mention was made of the tests - took exception to Principled’s conclusion that Vista SP1 and XP produced comparable results.

“Hard to believe when every other review site on the planet shows pretty much hands down [Vista] is slower on similar hardware,” said a user identified as Ceinach. “I didn’t even think this was a point of argument anymore. This statement is fairly stunning…. It’s like Microsoft is claiming the earth is still flat.”

Computerworld’s own tests, for instance, showed that file copying — a function Microsoft has said it spent considerable effort improving in SP1 — remained much slower on Vista than on Windows XP.

SP1 Doesn’t Give Much of a Boost

Principled Technologies also put Vista SP1 up against the pre-service pack version of the operating system. When armed with SP1, PCs finished 87% of the consumer chores faster than plain Vista, and wrapped up more of the business operations faster as well. But the speed improvements were meager, said Principled. Most of the business tests were completed just fractions of a second faster by Vista SP1 than by Vista.

“Overall, Windows Vista SP1 was more responsive than Windows Vista on most comparisons,” the report stated. “Performance differences between the two operating systems were typically less than a quarter second.”

Users noticed that, too. “All that work on Service Pack 1 and it’s only a quarter second faster?” asked a user pegged as “eponymousnyc.”

The two reports, one that outlines the consumer tests, the other for the business tests, can be downloaded in PDF format from Principled Technologies site.

Popularity: 1% [?]


  By using/following this site you agree to our Legal Disclaimer

Subscribe to GoHacking.Com


Enjoyed this article?
Subscribe to GoHacking.Com and get daily updates in your email for free

3 Comments »

  • Slim0123 said:

    I don’t know whatever they have tested above but I think I can share my experience with vista and xp

    xp is faster than vista only on low end pcs, on todays medium class pcs, vista outperforms xp in almost every expect(May it be in terms of speed, security, networking, etc, )….

    xp takes a loong time to start from a cold boot but vista starts as if it was never turned off….
    the secret lies in the fact that vista makes efficient use of the hardware present in the system provided that you should give it some good hardware platform to perform…….

    seeing is believing, so better you try it yourself if you have a computer with some good configuration(dont forget to install 64-bit vista if your system supports as it provides much more speed than its 32-bit counterpart)

  • sahil said:

    yar i want to ask u about your post “a virus prg.to disable usb ports” . i am using usb keyboard and mouse. if i disabled my usb ports, i will not be able to give input to the pc. then is there any way to recover??? reply soon
    - [email protected]

  • waffles said:

    i’ve allways thought vista sucks because after i got it my friends stuck with xp because they were complaining about how slow and stupid vista is but now since i see this post i can prove that they’re about the same but when it comes to graphix and gaming i know xp beats vista hands down cause i have tried it

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.